We are piloting a new program to label posts with community notes to help users identify the opinions they are receiving about posts.

Although users can 'like' X's posts, it is difficult to determine what specific opinions a 'like' expresses. Therefore, X is testing a feature that allows users to see what specific opinions users who have seen a post have, using

https://www.axios.com/2025/06/05/x-elon-musk-community-notes

According to a report from news media Axios, X is testing a program that allows users with different opinions to highlight where they agree with each other using the Community Notes feature. Community Notes displays notes from users who disagree with posts that may be misleading, but the feature is expanding to provide a broader overview of controversial topics.

Below is a screenshot of the new feature shown by Axios. When users who participate in the program 'like' a particular post, they will be asked to respond with a survey asking them whether they 'like this post' (e.g., 'I agree' or 'It's interesting'), or whether they 'don't like this post' (e.g., 'I don't agree' or 'I'm not interested').

Accounts that participate in the program may see a community note under the post stating, 'Some people have different opinions on this post,' as shown in the image below. From here, you can respond with your own opinion, and you can also see specifically what opinions other users had when reacting to the post.

According to Keith Coleman, vice president of product at X, the test program will begin with a small number of users in the U.S. and gradually expand. Through the test, the company plans to identify users' 'likes' and posts that are likely to be popular, as well as develop algorithms to identify 'liked' posts from various perspectives.

'X's data shows that there is actually a great deal of agreement on social media conversations, even on controversial issues. This pilot has the potential to generate momentum and energy around widely shared opinions that could completely change how we think about public debate and governance,' Coleman said.